Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 661 - 680
of 777
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman surveys the attorneys who have argued the largest number of close Supreme Court cases over the past six years and looks for patterns in the way the justices align with repeat attorneys, observing that “although there is some pattern in the voting alignments between attorneys and Justices, some predictable patterns did not play out as might be expected. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:10 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissents this Term. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 4:25 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman considers whether the court has begun to return to post-election business as usual, examining recent cert petition and amicus brief filings and concluding that “the impact of a potentially more certain future can and likely is pushing the Court both from inside and out to begin to return to a more characteristic approach to its business. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, William Mears of CNN, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman characterizes the Ninth Circuit’s opinion as a “memo to Justice Kennedy,” while Karen Gullo and Andrew Harris of Bloomberg similarly observe that Kennedy is likely to be the “fulcrum” of the Court if it decides to review the case. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:16 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “the justices’ voting pairs and how they might shift if Justice [Anthony] Kennedy does retire at the end of the term. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am
” Briefly: In a post at Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the pace of cert. grants and argues that “this low rate of grants is troublesome due [to] aspects internal to the Court itself. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:47 am
Commentary on the cases and oral arguments come from Noah Feldman for Bloomberg View, Marci Hamilton at Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, David Gans at the Constitutional Accountability Center’s Text and History Blog, Eric Segall at ACSblog, John Culhane at Politico Magazine, Bob Tuttle and Ira Lupu at Cornerstone, Adam Winkler at ACSblog, Joseph Mansilla at Adventures in Doctrinal Wonderland, David Upham at The Public Discourse, Karl Laird at Oxford Human Rights Hub,… [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 9:54 am
I am pleased that Adam Feldman and Jake Truscott have published a Stat Review of OT 2023. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines evidence suggesting that Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the briefs filed by the Office of the Solicitor General at the Court’s invitation and concludes that “the SG is cautious about recommending cases to the Court, and as an entity would prefer to deny cases that are on the margin to keep the number of recommended grants low. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes the length of Supreme Court majority opinions from 1951 until the 2013 term according to several criteria, including author and subject matter. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 4:05 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman looks at the petitions the justice considered at this week’s “long conference” “that will in all likelihood at least minimally garner serious review” because they “either have an associated amicus brief, at least one elite attorney, or both. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am
Both Joan Biskupic of USA Today and Adam Liptak of the New York Times preview Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, while Orin Kerr also explains why al-Kidd is a “strange case” for this blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
’” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman observes that “with 55 cases already decided, we have unique and surprising patterns of decision-making among the justices,” most notably in “the Court’s 5-4 (or 5-3) decisions, where one vote could shift a decision in a different direction. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 4:19 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines the oral advocates and justices involved in “cases where the Court directly shifts policy either by ruling a statute (federal, state, or local) unconstitutional or by overturning its own precedent” since October Term 2000. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 4:01 am
At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman identifies “[s]everal possible facets of the justices’ new oral argument strategies [that] became apparent during the first week of oral arguments for the 2017 Supreme Court term. [read post]
17 May 2018, 4:26 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines “cases where states are involved or that come from state courts,” which “play an incredibly important role in the Supreme Court’s annual docket and … often have vast implications for state populations as well as for the nation as a whole. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:13 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “the most anticipated cases and decisions of the 2015-2016 Supreme Court Term. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 4:15 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman evaluates “the most successful firms, litigators, and groups before the Supreme Court during the 2016 term. [read post]
