Search for: "Amazon v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2022, 6:34 am by Kevin LaCroix
It is so interesting to me that, notwithstanding the passage of time since the initial coronavirus outbreak in the U.S. in March 2020, plaintiff shareholders continue to file COVID-19-related securities class action lawsuits — as we saw, for example, in the infrastructure overcapacity lawsuit filed last week against Amazon. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
It's about the safe harbours and personal data trips overseas.* A Site for Sore Eyes: Economics of Domain namesLike the economics of trade marks, the economics of domain names rests primarily on the information and signalling aspects of brands, writes Nicola.* Henry Wickham, the Amazon river and rubber trees--the state of biodiversity and biopiracy todayAround Christmas time in 2012, Neil published a post about the Global Seed Vault in Norway, whose avowed… [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Alina Artunian
In a 1992 case called Quill Corporation v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:17 pm by cf
Amazon shouldn’t have to, either. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 12:30 am
This was stated in Best Buy v Worldwide Sales Corporation [2000]FSR 686, in which Floyd J expressed concern about “exporting” the threats provisions overseas. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
We are very pleased to announce Lawfare‘s first e-book, Lawfare on the National Defense Authorization Acts, which is now available in Kindle format on Amazon for $4.99. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm by INFORRM
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am by INFORRM
Amazon has a new low-price health service called Amazon Clinic, where for as little as $30, patient-customers can consult with a clinician online from an Amazon partner, who can issue prescriptions. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]