Search for: "American President Lines v. United States"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2009, 3:22 am
See Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 12:06 pm
The United States argued that New York should be limited to situations in which Congress requires states to affirmatively enact policies set by Congress, arguing that “the constitutional line is crossed only when Congress compels the States to make law in their sovereign capacities. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
Before I quickly run through my constitutional views – which don’t differ much from Judge Carlos Bea’s partial dissent in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 8:28 am
The United States, meanwhile, firmly backed its ally, the Philippines. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:00 am
” Following the naval exercises, the navy conducted a review attended by Chinese President Xi Jinping. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
Or, instead, are they principal officers of the United States that must be appointed by the US President and confirmed by the Senate (as we do with Article III judges). [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:27 pm
United States, 505 U. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
City of New York, New York and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2020, 2:35 pm
Valeska V. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
I'm back for a final week of blogging about the research in my book Litigating Across the Color Line. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:32 pm
United States (1935), the Supreme Court held that President Franklin Roosevelt couldn’t lawfully remove a commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission for solely political reasons. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 3:19 pm
United States, the justices narrowed the scope of a federal criminal statute under which hundreds of Jan. 6 defendants – including Trump – were charged. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
” In line with Hutchinson’s stated goals, Section 1237(a)(1) authorizes the president to use his powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—without declaring a national emergency—against companies falling under subsection (b) of the provision. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
In American Farm Bureau v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 12:05 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 5:31 am
The DATA Act The DATA Act takes another swing at the president’s ability to invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to ban TikTok in the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am
That the author was born in Rumania and came to the United States at age twelve speaking no English makes Bickel’s verbal felicity all the more remarkable. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States had already banned the app. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 9:30 pm
” President Donald J. [read post]
