Search for: "Application of Barrett"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2015, 12:51 pm
Judge Abrams’ decision in Barrett, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 11:00 pm
Platform services may be combined with infrastructure services to offer all of the elements required for a customer to develop and implement its own applications. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 7:51 am
Courts in New York have defined “proper cause” to require applicants to show a special need to defend themselves. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 12:55 pm
.: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold the first of four consecutive days of hearings on the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to serve as an associate justice of the U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 10:21 am
Citing an academic article by then-professor Amy Coney Barrett, Abitron further suggested that the Steele case should be overruled outright notwithstanding the principle of statutory stare decisis. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 10:46 am
Justices Thomas and Alito authored separate dissenting opinions, which were joined by Justices Gorsuch and Barrett. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
At the same time that Judge Amy Coney Barrett was extolling the clarity of originalism in her confirmation hearings in the Senate, the court’s most prominent originalists seemed to be suggesting that Framing-era precedents offered little insight into the proper application of the Constitution in a modern context. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 8:25 pm
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a dissenting opinion that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett joined. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
The OCCA’s about-face on the retroactive application of McGirt, despite its foundation in subject matter jurisdiction, effectively cut off access to relief for retrospective PCR applicants. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
New Applications and Hiring – USPTO had projected a 3.6% increase in application filings over last year, but application filings are currently up over 5.3% above the prior year. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 8:40 am
Solicitor General described as the plain meaning of the word “otherwise” to other means of obstructing the proceeding, such as by violently attacking the joint session of congress to count the electoral ballots–a plain meaning with which Justices Barrett, Sotomayor, and Kagan generally concurred in dissent–the Court held that the obstruction barred by (c)(2) must be tied to impairing the integrity or availability of evidence. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 4:14 pm
In Barrett v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
And Van Buren urges the court to adopt his construction to avoid constitutional questions that flow from the Due Process Clause and First Amendment and in adherence to the rule of lenity, which counsels leniency in the application of ambiguous criminal statutes. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 10:58 am
It says that "applicable individual[s] shall" purchase ACA-compliant health insurance. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:15 am
So we may get an occasional decision in which, say, Justice Gorsuch and Justice Barrett join the three progressive justices to overturn a conservative precedent, but such cases are likely to be rare. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:52 pm
Roberts and Barrett revealed less, but seemed persuaded that the government could sidestep this entire issue by modifying some agency practices. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:48 pm
Justices Samuel Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, and Jackson all peppered him with questions about how the government’s reading would work in practice and how a district court would apply it to a variety of scenarios beyond a Rehaif claim. [read post]
Symposium: “Schrödinger’s tax” is dead – and the command to buy health insurance is unconstitutional
9 Nov 2020, 6:28 am
“Under the new scheme, applicable individuals can lawfully choose between maintaining health insurance and doing nothing. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 2:08 pm
” Justice Amy Coney Barrett characterized one formulation of the major-questions doctrine as resting [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Barrett v Robinson is off to the Court of Appeal I am told. [read post]
