Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 661 - 680
of 57,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 4:37 pm
FLFMC, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:17 pm
The meaning of the statute was most recently explicated by the Supreme Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 4:49 am
APPEAL/JURISDICTIONUnited States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
In another recent Section 16(b) case, Huppe v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Specifically, section 1B1.10(b)(2)(B) states that [...] [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 6:46 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for A statement that: (A) a reasonable person in the declarant’s position would have made only if the person believed it to be true because, when made,... [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:02 am
This count carried a ten-year mandatory minimum - the usual (b)(1)(B) five-year term, doubled due to Parker’s prior drug felony conviction. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:54 pm
United States Endoscopy Group, Inc., District Judge Nelson S. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn –- Last week, in Athena Diagnostics, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:59 pm
The Supreme Court's Alice Corp. v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:15 am
The Federal Circuit’s recent Uniloc v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:55 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or to the... [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 6:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded the Tax Court’s determination of a partnership’s value as a going concern in Estate of Natalie B. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Lazo-Gavidia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 7:43 am
Per Clark v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:08 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 4:15 am
The Board’s Precedential... [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 3:03 am
Westlake argued that Larson's opinions, articulated in the Ohio state litigation, are relevant to the Kentucy case and thus discoverable pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) and 45(c)(3)(B)(ii). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:28 am
USCIS and Amin v. [read post]
