Search for: "BARRETT v. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,943
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 2:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Monday in Trump v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:58 pm
Barrett Prettyman Federal Courthouse. [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
II, § 2, cl. 2)); United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Fulton v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
The cases he cited included Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 6:16 am
Barrett v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 5:01 pm
As noted in my last post about today's Supreme Court ruling in in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
Anyone who believes that the Madison of 1787-88 was a devotee of "states rights" is truly illiterate. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am
In Sheetz v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:20 pm
Barrett cites several cases in which federal law pre-empts state family laws. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 2:17 pm
The event took the form of an interview in which Barrett (the professor, not the justice) posed questions to Murray about the state of the court. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 6:25 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court held 5-4 in PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:43 pm
United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am
Trump v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 8:58 am
The US Supreme Court ruled 8-1 Thursday in Cameron v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 10:59 am
On trial, Judge Barrett from the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
” Justices Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito’s opinion. [read post]
13 May 2025, 8:53 am
See Trump v. [read post]
