Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE"
Results 661 - 680
of 191,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2009, 3:35 am
R v Ghulam; [2009] WLR (D) 303 “The word ‘determination’ in s 4(6) of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964 refers only to a determination that a defendant is unfit to plead so that, where that provision's requirement for evidence from two or more registered medical practitioners to be before the court has not been met, [...] [read post]
19 May 2008, 2:27 am
” WLR Daily, 16th May 2008 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:04 am
” WLR Daily, 9th March 2009 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note that once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series [...] [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:14 am
” WLR Daily, 15th December 2008 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in [...] [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:57 am
Criminal procedure — Discharge of counsel — Reversible error Following a jury trial, at which he represented himself, Reginald Gardner, appellant, was convicted of attempted armed robbery; conspiracy to commit armed robbery; first-degree assault; use of a firearm in the commission of a crime of violence; possession of a firearm after having been convicted of […] The post REGINALD GARDNER v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 2:42 pm
In Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:37 am
Eastenders Cash and Carry plc and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWHC 2797 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 282 “The power of detention contained in s 139(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 was not limited to cases in which the goods in question were goods on which duty had not in fact been paid, but also covered cases in which there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that duty might not have been paid on the goods. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 7:05 am
There have been more comments in today's newspapers on the issue of migrants v. natives which require a reasoned response. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
The Pacira Pharmaceutical Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:31 am
The Pacira Pharmaceutical Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:43 am
The story of Buckley v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 9:32 am
Gates v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Briefing has been deferred pending resolution of Duran v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am
Since Shell UK Ltd & Ors v Total UK Ltd & Or (a case concerning the Buncefield oil terminal fire, which was due to be heard from 5 to 7 April 2011) has now been settled, the Supreme Court will instead hear the appeal in Jivraj v Hashwani on 6 and 7 April 2011. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 12:02 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in the case of Muldrow v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 9:17 am
Regina v Lavery Court of Appeal “There was no reason in principle why an offence taken into consideration, which was more serious than the offence charged, should not result in a higher sentence than would otherwise have been the case. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 2:06 am
Hoholm v Government of Norway Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Where an issue was available to be raised by a claimant on the evidence adduced at an extradition hearing, she was entitled to raise that issue on appeal to the Divisional Court, even though it had not been raised before. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Said Anna Greenberg, a Democratic pollster, quoted in "Why Abortion Has Become a Centerpiece of Democratic TV Ads in 2022/Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:05 pm
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 11:06 am
The pre-motion conference in connection with defendant's contemplated motion to dismiss complaint in Warner v. [read post]
