Search for: "Bail v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,715
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by Andrew Hamm
Melissa Daniels of Law360 covers the Justice Department’s admission to the Court that it understated the time spent in no-bail detention by certain undocumented immigrants with criminal records in a 2003 immigration case, Demore v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 1:54 pm by Lawrence S. Goldman
The Supreme Court decision in McDonnell v United States, decided June 27, has given several politicians whose corruption convictions are on appeal both a cause for optimism and freedom on bail pending appeal. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:44 am by Terry Hart
We want bail, funds unfrozen for lawyers & living expenses. [read post]
As if Michael Gove MP needed further reminding, in wake of Colin Yeo’s appearance on World at One on Wednesday where he pointed out the fundamental error of the Justice Secretary’s assertion that Britain cannot deport EEA nationals with a criminal record, the Supreme Court in R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 makes clear that EEA nationals can be deported by virtue of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006,… [read post]
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 4:25 am by Stephen Pitel
  After the 2008 financial crisis the Canadian government bailed out General Motors of Canada Ltd (GM Canada). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 2:28 pm by Robichaud
From there, that app might then arrange for the best sureties to attend your bail hearing the next day to get you out of jail. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade has an interesting post entitled “Should governments bail out newsprint newspapers? [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 4:55 am by David Markus
S. 143, 147 (1972), what you were wearing, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 4:43 pm by John C. Manoog III
Related Blog Posts United States Supreme Court Reverses Conviction in Massachusetts Stun Gun Possession Case – Caetano v. [read post]