Search for: "Barrett v. People"
Results 661 - 680
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2020, 2:35 pm
And, Justice Barrett did not signal her recusal. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Judging by the lack of a clear agent-employer relationship and the apparent protection afforded by the Communications Decency Act, many people may assume that ride-sharing companies can rest easily. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
Influencers like Isabella Barrett, 15, are worth millions for “livin the life girl! [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 3:38 pm
A. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
But like Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
See Barrett, 250 Va. at 248, 462 S.E.2d at 112. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
Barrett, Procedural Common Law. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:13 am
S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
The statement highlights the strong overlap between promoting and protecting competition in digital markets and safeguarding people’s data. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
As Justice Amy Coney Barrett seemingly implied during the Murthy v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 12:41 pm
A harder and purer opinion might not get the signatures of Justices Barrett, Kavanaugh, or Gorsuch. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am
Under the Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Nieves v. [read post]
29 May 2011, 10:26 am
Ivey Barrett, Linda Barrett appellant. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Investigating Trump’s Actions in Jan. 6 Criminal Probe MSN – Carol Leonnig, Devlin Barrett, Josh Dawsey, and Spencer Hsu (Washington Post) | Published: 7/26/2022 The U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:29 am
Scott v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 10:41 am
From Friend v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
The Court will not want a repeat of the calamitous decision in Bush v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]