Search for: "Bear v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 14,926
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am by Alden Abbott
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm by Anthony O'Rourke
Last week, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
The Ohio Supreme Court held Wednesday that when a defendant makes a prima facie showing that a prior conviction was unconstitutional because it was uncounseled and resulted in confinement, the state bears the burden of proving that the defendant properly waived his right to counsel in the earlier case that conviction can enhance the a penalty for a new offense. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am by ernst
  It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York Pistol and Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am by Matthew Kahn
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:02 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in McDonald v. [read post]