Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 15,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
State, Dept. of Revenue (Fuel Taxation) News Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/news/currentnews.htmlWe feature several articles about the new Bears Ears National Monument. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
State of Alaska (ICWA) People of the State of Michigan v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 7:44 am
United States Fin. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 5:03 am
In other words, if antitrust is indeed the “magna carta” of American free enterprise (see United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 10:01 am
I keep telling you this, and it bears repeating--this is the United States of America. [read post]
Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, Germaninvestments AG, v. Allomet Corp., Docket No. 291, 2019
4 Mar 2020, 12:54 pm
(Hldg.) v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court decided the case of New York State Pistol and Rifle Association v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 9:25 am
Maine for the proposition that "'the powers delegated to Congress under Article I of the United States Constitution do not include the power to subject nonconsenting States to private suits for damages in state courts.'" But the dissent would give this sentence more weight than it can bear. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 5:02 pm
In People v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:59 am
Where the proprietor of a trade mark supplies to its authorised distributors items bearing that mark, intended for demonstration to consumers in authorised retail outlets, and bottles bearing the mark from which small quantities can be taken for supply to consumers as free samples, those goods, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, are not put on the market within the meaning of Directive 89/104 and Regulation No 40/94 [= Case C-127/09 Coty Prestige Lancaster v… [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 3:24 pm
Last week, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 10:50 am
The Ohio Supreme Court held Wednesday that when a defendant makes a prima facie showing that a prior conviction was unconstitutional because it was uncounseled and resulted in confinement, the state bears the burden of proving that the defendant properly waived his right to counsel in the earlier case that conviction can enhance the a penalty for a new offense. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:41 am
Homer v Homer, 2022 WL 4290465 (S.D. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:29 pm
Whilst this does have a bearing upon Mrs Justice Pauffley's decision, it is not central, and I shall therefore concentrate on the essential facts, which can be stated briefly:1. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Our bad.The second, issued minutes later, in State Farm v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:33 am
It is a preview of a longer version of the paper forthcoming in the UC Davis Law Review in the spring, published now because of its relevance to New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 11:07 am
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit disagreed, concluding that it was bound by its 2010 decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
Supreme Court’s recent decision in New York Pistol and Rifle Association, Inc. v. [read post]
