Search for: "Bowling v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 839
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Gus Kwidis of the Beaver County Court of Common Pleas granted summary judgment to a defendant bowling in a claim brought by a plaintiff who tripped and fell while entering a bathroom at a bowling alley. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm by Randall Reese
Barton An un-named bowling alley Bi-Lo asserts that it has continued to pay the rent under the lease for the entire period and, further, that the lease contains no express requirement that the premises be maintained "open for business. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Geoffrey Rapp
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:43 am by Robert Steele
App. 3d 735, 586 N.E.2d 679 (1991); see also State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
Although it sounds relatively esoteric, the legal issue at the heart of the case is quite significant in administrative law: whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bowles v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm by cdw
” [via FindLaw] Ronnie Lee Bowling v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 10:06 am
Stay tuned for more important stuff, like Rumpole's super bowl locks. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 7:16 am by Amy Howe
Representative Steve King (R-Iowa), one of the bill’s drafters, testified that the bill would expand public access to the courts; although millions of people can watch the Super Bowl, he noted, the Supreme Court decides momentous cases like Bush v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:23 am
  Third, he could get his wish:   the case involving Janet Jackson’s breast exposure at the Super Bowl, FCC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Bowling, 706 A.2d 937, 940 (R.I. 1998) (after commencing litigation, plaintiff "was no longer entitled to the benefits of the patient-physician privilege"); Maynard v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]