Search for: "Brady v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 1,723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 1:57 pm by Cody Poplin
The test is just the latest in the expanding arms race in South Asia, following India’s recent tests of its Agni-IV and Agni-V missiles, which are capable of traveling 2,500 and 3,400 miles respectively. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Lynaugh]”; (2) whether the state’s post-trial disclosure of evidence relating to ammunition used in the crime resulted in a violation of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under Brady v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 4:11 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Mark H Bonner (Ave Maria School of Law) has posted The Inquisition by Special Prosecutor in United States V. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by SHG
Chemerinsky notes in the cert petition that 9th Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski wrote in his dissent from denial of en banc review in United States v. [read post]