Search for: "C. v. A." Results 661 - 680 of 62,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 10:57 am by sally
Werynski v Mediatel 4B spólka z o o (Case C-283/09); [2011] WLR (D) 50 “In respect of acts which had been adopted in the field of Title IV of the EC Treaty, since December 1 2009 the Court of Justice of the European Union has had jurisdiction to hear and determine a reference for a preliminary ruling from a court against whose decision there was a judicial remedy under national law even where the reference was lodged prior to that date. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 6:50 am by Marta Requejo
Case C- 191/18, KN v Minister for Justice and Equality, is not about PIL; the questions referred to the CJ on March 16, actually relate to the European Arrest warrant (and Brexit). [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:19 am
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (Case C-529/07); [2009] WLR (D) 182 “The fact that, at the time of applying for registration of a sign as a trade mark, the applicant knew or was to be taken as knowing that an identical or similar sign capable of being confused with the applicant's sign [...] [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:09 am
Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (Case C-318/07); [2009] WLR (D) 27 “It was contrary to Community law to refuse income tax deductibility for a donation to a charity established in another member state where it was allowed in the case of charities established in the taxpayer's state and the taxpayer had no opportunity to show that the [...] [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 6:23 am
Among the nine majority opinions (which is more than I've seen in a while - and right before Christmas, too) is State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am by sally
Frisdranken Industrie Winters BV v Red Bull GmbH (Case C-119/10); [2012] WLR (D) 20 “A service provider who, under an order from and on the instructions of another person, filled packaging which was supplied to it by the other person who, in advance, affixed to it a sign which was identical with, or similar to, a sign protected as a trade mark did not itself make use of the sign that was liable to be prohibited under that provision.” WLR Daily, 15th December 2012… [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:49 am
East Devon District Council v Boundary Committee of the Electoral Commission [2009] EWHC 4 (Admin); WLR(D) 5 “The power under s 5(3)(c) of the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007 for the Boundary Committee of the Electoral Commission to make ‘an alternative proposal’ enabled the Committee to make two or more proposals. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 5:15 am by Peter Reap
The determinations of the Board were all supported by substantial evidence (B/E Aerospace, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:07 am by rtruman
L&C Law’s Meg Garvin on Oregon Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Victims’ Right to Be Present at Hearings :: Oregon v. [read post]