Search for: "CANNING v. DOJ"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,715
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2007, 1:02 am
The judge, in Twentieth Century Fox v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In the Apple v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 11:57 am
Supreme Court Urged to Approve Scheme Liability in Securities Fraud ActionsAlthough the SEC and DOJ did not file an amicus brief in the scheme liability case now before the Supreme Court, a number of other entities did, including the state securities administrators association, the council of institutional investors, state attorneys general, and eminent law professors.In the case of Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
As the Court noted in Lewis v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 5:46 am
As the Court noted in Lewis v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
As part of your call, you can ask your Senator to request consideration of the amendment on the Senate floor. [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Xiulu Ruan v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 10:59 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:28 pm
If the DOJ appeals, it will be easy to reverse. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 4:44 am
The DOJ intervened in the recent FTC v Qualcomm case (in which Judge Koh found in favour of the FTC) and now on appeal. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 6:58 pm
In US v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:54 pm
Heller (2008) and in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:47 am
Yet it's the United States -- the DOJ -- arguing exactly the contrary. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:51 pm
New York, holding on one hand that a citizenship question can be asked on the census, but also that the Department of Commerce in this instance was lying when claiming to want to do so in 2020 solely in order to help DOJ enforce the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:30 pm
See also related Vox article.Studies: Mass Detention of Migrant Families is Unnecessary, Inefficient (Just Security, July 2018) [text]Unpacking DOJ’s New Claim that DHS Can Legally Detain Migrant Children with Their Parents for Longer than Twenty Days (Just Security Blog, July 2018) [text]Related post:- Thematic Focus: Detention, esp. in the U.S. (26 June 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm
”What:Hearing in Jewel v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:03 pm
Gonzaga Univ. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 10:10 am
DOJ Antitrust Division Head Christine Varney Offers Guidance on Leegin and Proposes "Structured Rule of Reason Test" For Evaluating RPM Under State Laws When the Supreme Court modified the prohibition against resale price maintenance agreements ("RPM") more than two years ago in Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
