Search for: "CASTLES v STATE" Results 661 - 680 of 806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone… [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
‘obviousness-type’ double patenting practise (America-Israel Patent Law) Injunction by ORT Israel against World ORT using name in Israel overturned (The IP Factor) United Kingdom An epic tale of… erm, patents and trademarks – EWHC (Pat) decides Datacard v Eagle (IPKat) (EPLAW) EWHC (Ch): Play-Doah ruling goes Hasbro’s way: Hasbro v Nahrmittel (Class 46) (IPKat) Hargreaves and the SME litigants (Solo Independent IP Practitioners) The patent… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:24 am by Michael Froomkin
What is not common is the end of the video, which depicts a rabbit rebellion where masses of rabbits storm the castle of the tigers and eat them alive. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
: The need to encourage legal entrepreneurship (Spicy IP) State’s copyright not exempt under RTI Act: Delhi Metro Rail Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 12:13 pm by Mike Aylward
Co. of the State of Pennsylvania, S153852 (Cal. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 10:18 am
 This isn't always useful for professional purposes, but it was really handy for Ilonka, whose day job was selling castles and stately homes. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 3:08 pm by Lawrence Solum
Supreme Court in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:32 am by Orin Kerr
He also wins the award for First Senator-Elect to Have Argued a Case in My Computer Crime Law Casebook — I know, that award is very prestigious, too — for having argued a commerce clause challenge to the federal child pornography statutes, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:34 am by Mike
 There are plenty of brilliant-and-poor kids at state universities who couldn't afford to attend Yale. [read post]