Search for: "California Co. v. Price"
Results 661 - 680
of 895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP finance) UK patent… [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
In a 1992 decision, in a California case, Nordlinger v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Lélos Kai Sia EE (and Others) v GlaxoSmithKline AEVE: (IPKat), US: Bio commends Sen Specter for patent reform stance: (Patent Docs), US: USPTO rules on two of four neural stem cell patents in dispute between StemCells Inc and Neuralstem Inc; parties disagree on how extensively claims amended: (IP Law360), (IPBiz), US: Insmed continues fight for generic biologic approval: (GenericsWeb), Pharma & Biotech - Products Cipralex (Escitalopram) –… [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:45 am
Goldman Sachs & Co., 693 F.3d 145 (2nd Cir. 2012) (allowing plaintiff to assert class claims with respect to securities that the plaintiff itself didn’t buy). [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:16 am
In fact, acquisitions by hospitals and private equity in provider services broke records last year according to Bain & Co’s 2019 global healthcare report. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:18 pm
In O’Bannon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 12:05 am
In Merisant Co. v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 12:00 pm
Yet Brown v. [read post]
19 Feb 2025, 6:13 am
Colony Insurance Co. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 9:26 pm
In places like Southern California, where the price of peak electricity is more than four times the national average, solar power is a no-brainer. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 12:54 pm
For example, in Nichols v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 11:18 am
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Gordon Price v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
We also provide an update on the status of mandatory federal forum provisions in the Ninth and Seventh Circuits and in the State of California. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:50 am
–Boston v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 12:07 pm
Eli Lilly & Co., No. 2:12-cv-9366-SVW (MANx) (C.D. [read post]
