Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 661 - 680 of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2014, 4:01 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Facebook California Supreme Court Rules That a ZIP Code is Personal Identification Information — Pineda v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
  By itself, off-label promotion is no more causal than, as we commented the other day, a “video of a company employee kicking his dog. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
We also provide an update on the status of mandatory federal forum provisions in the Ninth and Seventh Circuits and in the State of California. [read post]
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
That provision exempts from liability any cable recipient who is authorized by a cable company to receive a transmission. [read post]
9 Jan 2022, 6:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
The company’s share price declined 12% on this news. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 5:17 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The reason the earlier cases were filed as derivative suits rather than as securities class action lawsuits was that in each case there had not been a significant drop in the defendant company’s share price when the company’s data breach was disclosed. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
In addition, if a company uses transition plans, scenario analysis, or internal carbon prices to manage a material climate-related risk, the final rules require disclosures about such use. [read post]