Search for: "Campbell v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 2,048
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm by James Eckert
Matter of Campbell v Pearce also held that once a defendant has started his sentence the court cannot vacate the plea because jeopardy had attached.Properly understood, I think this Court of Appeals decision that "County Court lacks the power to vacate the conviction or plea" removes the threat of state time from people who successfully challenge illegally severe local court sentences, and prevents vacating a plea induced by an illegally severe sentence, if… [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Mayberry; Peter Campbell King, and Donna L. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC ("G & G") of Campbell, California initiated a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Elsa Valdez and Tikal #2, Inc., both of Indianapolis, Indiana, illegally intercepted and broadcast the Saul Alvarez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Stanford Law School's profile of Jud Campbell, who recently joined its faculty (Stanford Lawyer). [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:34 pm by WSLL
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Robert A. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 12:56 am
On October 21, 2009, a California District Court judge denied a motion to decertify a punitive damages class in Iorio v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm by familoo
That test is a crystallisation of a process first articulated in Campbell the same year (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457), a case I’ll come back to. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Bob Farb
Campbell, 282 N.C. 125 (1972) (premises not sufficiently connected by affiant’s conclusory statements); State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am by Bob Farb
Campbell, 282 N.C. 125 (1972) (premises not sufficiently connected by affiant’s conclusory statements); State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]