Search for: "Campbell v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2007, 9:41 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 1:35 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC ("G & G") of Campbell, California initiated a lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Elsa Valdez and Tikal #2, Inc., both of Indianapolis, Indiana, illegally intercepted and broadcast the Saul Alvarez v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 2:34 pm
Campbell, JudgeRepresenting Appellant: Robert A. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:09 am
” For further details, see Bergeson & Campbell, P.C. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Stanford Law School's profile of Jud Campbell, who recently joined its faculty (Stanford Lawyer). [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
People v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 11:36 am
NRDC v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:01 pm
Matter of Campbell v Pearce also held that once a defendant has started his sentence the court cannot vacate the plea because jeopardy had attached.Properly understood, I think this Court of Appeals decision that "County Court lacks the power to vacate the conviction or plea" removes the threat of state time from people who successfully challenge illegally severe local court sentences, and prevents vacating a plea induced by an illegally severe sentence, if… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:51 am
MONTEE v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 6:06 pm
Campbell cites Ramey v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
’” She noted that the United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Mayberry; Peter Campbell King, and Donna L. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 12:22 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 12:56 am
On October 21, 2009, a California District Court judge denied a motion to decertify a punitive damages class in Iorio v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
Campbell, 282 N.C. 125 (1972) (premises not sufficiently connected by affiant’s conclusory statements); State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 7:02 am
Campbell, 282 N.C. 125 (1972) (premises not sufficiently connected by affiant’s conclusory statements); State v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
That test is a crystallisation of a process first articulated in Campbell the same year (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457), a case I’ll come back to. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:36 am
Campbell The United States Supreme Court was presented with the question of who has the burden of proof when a licensee files an action seeking a declaration of non-infringement against the patentee. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 6:11 am
" That case was Illinois v. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 8:21 pm
Campbell Barker on August 26, 2024, in the case, Texas v. [read post]
