Search for: "Carrie Russell" Results 661 - 680 of 845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am by Miriam Seifter
  “They have power to make the rules needed to carry out provisions of the Act. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:22 am by Russell S. Whittle Esq. MSCC
§ 1395w-26(b)(1) (“The Secretary shall establish by regulation standards for MA organizations and plans consistent with, and to carry out, this part. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:08 am by Steve Hall
The Los Angeles Times carries, "Supreme Court struggles with DNA testing issue," by David Savage. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:41 am by Amy Howe
  [Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., in which I am a partner, was part of the team representing the family at the Court through the Stanford Supreme Court Clinic, but I was not involved in the case.] [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:34 am by The Book Review Editor
  Still, as Bertrand Russell observed, it is much easier to be persuaded that ontological arguments are no good than it is to say exactly what is wrong with them. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 6:46 am by Adam Thierer
The state would impose the equivalent of “must carry” mandates on popular or partisan websites, forcing them to carry links to opposing viewpoints. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 9:00 am by Stephens Mamari
Rather than create a legal terminology from scratch, however, we thought it absolutely necessary to carry out a kind of textual excavation of the rich, but mainly hidden M? [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:40 am by Garry J. Wise, Wise Law Office, Toronto
Arnot Russell Maves was a man of reasonable means, with assets worth in excess of $300,000. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:56 am by Lyle Denniston
[Disclosure:  The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents petitioner Albert Florence. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 1:51 pm by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Russell Smith at Legal As She Is Spoke goes through the old favorites like New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:12 pm by Beth Farmer
Chesler reiterated that the product should be defined as “credit card transactions,” and that because the plaintiffs failed to prove competitive harm in that market, they did not carry their prima facie burden. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Charon QC
There will be lots of pictures of young people in suits, carrying briefcases, looking busy and important. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 11:20 am by Beth Farmer
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit reversed, holding that the lower court had erred in defining the relevant market and, accordingly, that the plaintiffs had failed to carry their burden. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:34 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Russell Federal Building in Atlanta, while the federal defendants appeared today before United States Magistrate Judge Janet F. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:30 pm by Miriam Seifter
It is not clear that the term carries that implication. [read post]
31 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Charon QC
There will be lots of pictures of young people in suits, carrying briefcases, looking busy and important. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am by Ronald Mann
  Why should we expect the Justices to assume that a clause explicitly preempting state law should carry with it implied preemption of federal law. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:51 am by Rory Little
It argues, first, that the statutory definitions of “analogue” do not “carry over” to define the mens rea requirement (“knowingly”) of Section 841(a). [read post]