Search for: "Clark v. State Bar"
Results 661 - 680
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Clarke, No. 09-1629 In habeas proceedings of a defendant convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, district court's conclusion that the state trial judge had impermissibly (though unintentionally) coerced a guilty verdict as a result of a series of voir dire examinations of individual jurors is reversed as the AEDPA's deferential standard of review controls in this case, and the district court employed an insufficiently deferential standard of… [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 1:26 pm
Clarke, No. 09-1629 In habeas proceedings of a defendant convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment, district court's conclusion that the state trial judge had impermissibly (though unintentionally) coerced a guilty verdict as a result of a series of voir dire examinations of individual jurors is reversed as the AEDPA's deferential standard of review controls in this case, and the district court employed an insufficiently deferential standard of review. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:07 pm
” Knight v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:59 pm
Nevertheless, the year 1963 is a critical milestone for the Florida capital defense bar because it was in 1963 that the United States Supreme Court brought us Gideon v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 12:59 pm
Nevertheless, the year 1963 is a critical milestone for the Florida capital defense bar because it was in 1963 that the United States Supreme Court brought us Gideon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:16 am
The question in Kay v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 9:46 pm
I am thankful to my friend Eugene White for drawing to my attention a recent case from the ACT where a solicitor, David Landers, had some difficulties in dealing with ACT authorities on behalf of his client, a teacher who wanted to retire and get a payout due to illness.Because of the significance of this decision, I have set out the judgment in full.DAVID LANDER v COUNCIL OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY[2009] ACTSC 117 (11 September 2009)APPEAL - Appeal against… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 6:52 am
Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Clark Equipment Co., 122 S.W.3d 530, 533-37 (Ky. 2003); Tabieros v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:48 am
Plaintiff claimed that defendant’s claim was barred by laches. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:01 pm
See Hicks v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:56 pm
However, in 1985, the Georgia Supreme Court, in Sutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:08 am
Clarke
CLINTON COUNTYCriminal Practice
Mother Violates Probation by Engaging in Crime Constituting Endangering Welfare of a Child
People v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
They are, rather, asserting claims that sound in traditional state tort law. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:04 pm
Lamonica (Breach of contract; summary judgment; whether court improperly concluded that action was barred by res judicata) AC29835 Tsionis v. [read post]
