Search for: "Close v. U. S" Results 661 - 680 of 1,893
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2018, 8:59 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
The seeds of most of them can also be found in the Supreme Court's crucial holding in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Sarah Andropoulos
”This amendment, which served to move the proscription on independent judicial research from a comment to the black letter text of the rule, highlighted the ABA’s growing concern with judges’ use of the internet to potentially (if inadvertently) conduct fact-finding outside the confines of the adversarial process. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
(2) Is the district court’s order denying the appellants’ objections to the remedial map appealable under 28 U. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:41 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Dufficy’s ruling in Matter of Kassab v Kasab, 2018 NY Slip Op 50934(U) [Sup Ct Queens County June 11, 2018], comes on the heels of a post-trial decision last year in a related case brought by Nissim in which Justice Dufficy conditionally ordered dissolution of their corporation known as Corner 160 Associates, Inc. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm by Benson Varghese
The location on Carpenter’s phone closely matched the places where robberies occurred and this location information was used as evidence in his conviction. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:17 am by Steven Boutwell
  According to the majority, the substantial nexus requirement is closely related to the due process minimum contacts requirement and that it is well settled that a business need not have a physical presence to satisfy the due process requirement. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
The SG says that whether review is warranted “is a close question,” but “[o]n balance” the case warrants review to resolve a conflict between the Washington Supreme Court and the U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:21 am by Kent Scheidegger
S. 250 (2006), a retaliatory prosecution claim, would seem to be more closely on point. [read post]