Search for: "Commissioner v. Court Holding Co."
Results 661 - 680
of 780
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2022, 7:55 am
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:07 pm
See, Kaplan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The trial court sustained the Board’s demurrer without leave to amend, holding that the registration was exempt from CEQA as a ministerial act. [read post]
9 May 2008, 10:30 pm
: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Patents Rise of machine translation services: (IPKat), USPTO / EPO / JPO progress on ‘common application format’ for expedited examination: (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog), Proponents: ‘Time is now’ for TRIPs biodiversity amendment in Doha round: (Intellectual Property Watch), TRIPs amendment in favour of disclosures for genetic resources/traditional knowledge patents gathers support: (Afro-IP), WIPO… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
(Ontario Court of Appeal,TPG Technology Consulting Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
") A New Jersey federal judge backed a special master's order that Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Tax Court held in Martin Ice Cream Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:08 am
Supreme Court held in Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:24 am
See, e.g., Consolidated Edison Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Judgment was reserved Judge Lynn Griffin dismissed an appeal in Peter Beswick v Information Commissioner [2022] UKFTT 360 (GRC). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Existing case law holds that employers are strictly liable for harassment committed by “officials who may be treated as the organization’s proxy. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 5:01 am
However, Illinois Courts have recognized a more modem theory as suggested by Professor Larson which suggests that, 'there must be the intentional doing of something of a quasi-criminal nature, either with knowledge, that is likely to result in serious injury, or with wanton disregard of probable consequences.' Stembridge Builders v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
" Similarly, in Great Plains Container Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
It may be assumed that today’s Supreme Court (which has deemed consumer welfare to be the lodestone of antitrust enforcement since Reiter v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:30 am
http://t.co/0vWF04PP # Dropbox Reports User Accounts Were Hijacked, Adds New Security Features http://t.co/wQetUfUW # Prison workers settle lawsuit http://t.co/x5ozIgKO # Data breaches up 19 percent, GAO reports http://t.co/8EHEgUQM # Privacy commissioner ‘deeply disturbed’ by Election Ontario’s handling of voter data http://t.co/F0q5SIer # CSO Magazine Publishes Hogan Lovells Article "Dangerous Assumptions About Clouds" http://t.co/LGWFimug # NBC Is The… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[13]Another dissenting Commissioner said that “a number of [SEC] disclosure requirements have long related to environmental matters,” pointing to many “analyses from law firms explaining” SEC “disclosure requirements regarding climate change. [read post]
