Search for: "Core v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 7,982
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Perhaps the most eye-opening was Dubin v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 9:33 pm
In re Core Communications, Inc., 531 F.3d 849, 862 (D.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 5:36 am
But as even Crowell v. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am
The letters versed about the (alleged) violation by Ericsson of sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act.The core issue at hand is whether the CCI can intervene to define reasonable royalties on the basis of sections 3 and 4 of the Indian Competition Act – or if such matter must be reserved to the Indian Controller of Patents (or Civil Courts) according to Chapter XVI of the Indian Patent Act. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 2:23 pm
Ginsberg v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Also informative are emerging state and local efforts to regulate AI, including increased interest from state attorneys general seeking concurrent enforcement authority with any federal regulatory regime for AI and dozens of state-level legislative proposals, focused on the use of AI in various contexts. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 6:28 pm
It is as important to develop legal doctrine that preserves the core principle of asset partitioning among autonomous legal persons (whether public or private). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 2:55 pm
But as even Crowell v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
’”[7] While it is true that we can take actions in the public interest and for the protection of investors, those actions need to relate to our core mission. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:14 am
Such a service is regulated only if prescribed by the Secretary of State or specified in an order made by the Treasury. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 1:53 am
In Sun Pharma v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
These U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 2:42 pm
"); Sweezy v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
The rationale behind the practice directions is stated by the courts with nearly identical phrasing. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Under the bill, even where the issuer of an ancillary asset “engaged in entrepreneurial or managerial efforts that primarily determined the value” of the token — which, under the test established by the Supreme Court in SEC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 9:18 am
Chevron v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:10 am
By this point, her stated view was that she no longer wished to return to the property. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Here is the abstract: This Essay is written in the shadow of a series of noxious attacks on core principles of federal Indian law, most notoriously Haaland v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 2:50 pm
From Wade v. [read post]
