Search for: "D. S."
Results 661 - 680
of 236,439
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2024, 6:03 pm
USCIS (D. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 5:52 pm
§ 314.53(d)(5) (“Patent information will be considered to be submitted to FDA for purposes of paragraph (d)(3) of this section as of the earlier of the date the information submitted on Form FDA 3542 is date-stamped by the Central Document Room, or officially received by FDA in an electronic format submission that complies with § 314.50(l)(5)”), which states that once patent information is received by FDA it is considered submitted and Orange Book-listed . . .… [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:19 pm
Div. 2015), the court had to decide whether the facility qualified as a “residential health care facility” under New York’s Public Health Law § 2801-d. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:29 pm
Es importante señalar que estas cifras pueden estar infladas debido a definiciones y protocolos inconsistentes o a una débil comprensión de la agresión sexual. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 12:26 pm
Similar to its federal counterpart, South Carolina Rule of Evidence 801(d)(2)(B) provides an exclusion to the rule against hearsay for The statement is offered against a party and is...a statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief... [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
In the original ruling, which was covered in a separate article, the CAFC held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) properly applied the estoppel provision of 37 CFR § 42.73(d)(3)(i) in invalidating SoftView’s amended claims submitted in inter partes reexaminations based on a prior inter partes review (IPR) decision. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:15 am
In the original ruling, which was covered in a separate article, the CAFC held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) properly applied the estoppel provision of 37 CFR § 42.73(d)(3)(i) in invalidating SoftView’s amended claims submitted in inter partes reexaminations based on a prior inter partes review (IPR) decision. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 9:00 am
He's great! [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:27 am
What’s New in eDiscovery Pricing? [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 7:16 am
What is ESG-Related D&O Risk Going to Look Like Going Forward? [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
In other words, if settlement of the M&A claim would result in the acquired company’s shareholders receiving more value for the sale of the company, then the settlement will not be covered by the D&O policy. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
In other words, if settlement of the M&A claim would result in the acquired company’s shareholders receiving more value for the sale of the company, then the settlement will not be covered by the D&O policy. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:18 am
So, you know,it’s a, it’s a side gig that’s a lot of fun to do. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 3:00 am
Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.). [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 2:21 am
That’s what happened recently to Mark D. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 11:29 pm
In his letter [PDF] to Judge William Alsup, Boucher says that passage “mischaracterize[s] my work in a manner that has led to reputational harm, including causing a major media outlet to refer to me incorrectly as a ‘fraudster.'” The letter – a request rather than a defamation lawsuit at this point – scolds the plaintiffs’ attorneys (cc’d) for the unwarranted use of his name to support their claims against Anthropic. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 8:48 pm
In the era of the Administrative State, it might seem that federal agencies have the power to create, expand, or amend any laws that they’d like. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 7:00 am
" The post Contrast: Dana Bash’s Combative Interview With J.D. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 5:46 am
If only you'd had the sense and the restraint to delete most of the words. [read post]
1 Sep 2024, 4:02 am
Treat them with respect — just the way you’d like them to treat you. [read post]
