Search for: "DAVIE v. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 6,152
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2010, 2:25 pm
(Eugene Volokh) So says the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Davis v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
Davis is not innocent. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Another Ninth Circuit case, Davis v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Court House, Richmond Va., during the Davis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:16 pm
Hyundai Motor America v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 6:55 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 8:37 am
Michelle Davis won in State v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
Such state laws are often called Religious Freedom Restoration Acts, or RFRAs—named and patterned after the federal RRFA adopted by Congress after the Supreme Court’s 1990 decision in Employment Division v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
2010AP2966-CR State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 7:12 am
Davis became infamous in 2015 for refusing to issue same-sex couples marriage licenses despite the Supreme Court ruling of Obergefell v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:11 am
You can access today's ruling in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:28 am
Yesterday, the Court handed down the biggest decision of the term (measured by financial stakes), when it uphold Kentucky's tax exemption for interest on Kentucky's state and local bonds in Kentucky Dep't of Revenue v Davis (06-666) . [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:16 pm
Davis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 12:51 pm
Davie and Executive Director Sandford N. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:55 am
United States [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 7:13 am
Limpuangthip v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 7:17 am
Before I end my blog holiday and come back from New York, I thought you might just be slightly interested in this US Supreme Court case showing that non-discriminatory inter-state commerce is protected in a way analogous to (thought different from, obviously) free movement law in the EU. [read post]
