Search for: "DEFENDANT'S INSURANCE COMPANIES, ET AL"
Results 661 - 680
of 994
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2011, 12:24 pm
Space Pencil, Inc. et al., N.D. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
In its over-300-page complaint filed on 8/19/2011, GEICO General Insurance Company, et. al (hereinafter referred to as "GEICO") asserts that the 32 defendants named in this case--13 physicians, 18 entities, and 1 entity owner-- ("Defendants") defrauded GEICO in an amount in excess of $12.1 million under New York's No-Fault Insurance law. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:31 am
Joel Steinger, et al. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company, 505 F.3d 401 (6th Cir. 2007), and Freeman v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Spitzer et al., Case No. 11-05843). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 2:56 pm
In the trial that arose out of the Chicago pedestrian accident, a jury entered a $594,245 verdict against Papadopoulos and his cab company employer, an amount that actually exceeded the defendants' insurance policy limits. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
http://j.st/SZM Life Partners, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Hewlett-Packard Company, et. al. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
., Defendant and Respondent. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:13 pm
State of Florida, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:15 pm
BETTY WALSH ET AL. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:37 am
Obama, et al., docket 11-117). [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:59 am
Morrow, Morrow, Ryan & Basset, et al. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 10:01 pm
The deal did not affect AIG's net income and was the type of transaction that AIG -- and many other companies in the insurance industry - had done for years without any adverse market reaction, much less a criminal investigation. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:33 pm
Co. et al., __ Cal. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:33 pm
Co. et al., __ Cal. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Sun Life Assurance Co. et al.). [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:09 pm
Lochner, Lees, et. al., No. 2008-CIV-6100 (Lacka. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:31 am
Garcia Holiday Tours, Et Al. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm
United Foundries, et al., the Ohio Supreme Court determined the insurance company did not have a duty to defend in a case where the stop-gap policy had a specific exclusion for bodily injury resulting from an act which is determined to have been committed by the employer with the belief that an injury is substantially certain to occur. [read post]
