Search for: "DH v. State"
Results 661 - 680
of 951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2022, 4:33 am
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS Following the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:19 am
In addition, DHS Secretary Alejandro N. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 8:03 am
DHS is not required to provide notice and comment. [read post]
13 Dec 2024, 6:09 am
See State of Texas v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
A group of 50 organisations and nearly 90 individual experts have signed a statement against the US Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) proposal to ask non-citizens to provide the passwords to their social media accounts in order to enter the United States. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:03 pm
Carey v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated that DHS’s actions illustrate its “ongoing commitment to Afghan nationals who provided valuable assistance to the United States over the past two decades. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:16 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, NAACP v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 10:57 am
(Some immigrants who entered legally into the United States seeking asylum have also been separated from their children.) [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
LeBlanc v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
The preliminary injunction issued by the court took effect immediately as of the date of the ruling (September 29, 2020) and will remain in effect pending resolution of the lawsuit Immigrant Legal Resource Center, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Rosenbaum noted that Department of Homeland Security (DHS) policies such as Secure Communities (S-Comm), which establishes an information-sharing partnership between DHS and law enforcement agencies to facilitate immigration enforcement actions against undocumented immigrants already in the custody of law enforcement, expand “the reach of immigration enforcement into the interior of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 12:50 pm
” In State of California, ex rel, Xavier Becerra v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:14 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 10:44 pm
Contraceptive Exemption Injunction: The United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction against the application of the contraceptives mandate in HHS regulations in Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. [read post]
