Search for: "Davis v. Smith" Results 661 - 680 of 765
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Smith , No. 08-1477 Sentence for distribution of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant defendant a continuance for another chance to present expert testimony; 2) the district court correctly applied 18 U.S.C. sec. 3553 (a) when sentencing defendant, and did not fail to adequately address the factors set forth in the statute; and 3) there is no evidence that the district court's tangential statements about early… [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
From Smith, it cannot be derived if and, if so, how the enantiomer has actually been obtained in individualized form. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 6:26 pm
- Pittsburgh lawyer David Wagner of Reed Smith on the firm's Environmental Law Resource Estate of Jorgensen v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Parke Davis & Co., 402 N.E.2d 194, 198-99 (Ill. 1980); Needham v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46)   Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46)   South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP)   Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:11 am
There was no emergency, but the lack of an emergency doesn't make a statement testimonial under Davis v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm by Michael Stevens
Bertha Smith     Benefits Review Board 09a0006n.06  Old Republic Insurance Company v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm by Michael Stevens
Bertha Smith     Benefits Review Board 09a0006n.06  Old Republic Insurance Company v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 9:53 pm
Christine Bruhn at the University of California, Davis published many of the pioneering studies on consumer acceptance, and recently made this comment about consumer acceptance of food irradiation in a series on the new FDA rule published by Jim Prevor’s Perishable Pundit (2008): “My work and that of other researchers over the last 20 years has found some people are ready to buy irradiated product right now….This group of consumers represents maybe 10 percent… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Davis, No. 07-1964 A conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm and possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although a vehicular safety statute involving dangling ornaments that police relied upon to make the stop at issue was unconstitutionally vague; 2) nevertheless, the exclusionary rule did not apply as police were relying in good faith on a presumptively valid statute. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Davis, 4850, 607/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 9897; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Davis Wright Tremaine Blog-Proud No problem finding the blogs here. [read post]