Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 661 - 680 of 29,806
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 7:16 am by Daniel Deacon
The second is “Chevron, De Novo: Delegation, Not Deference,” by John F. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
The Supreme Court is about to review a constitutional challenge to two unprecedented and very complicated laws regulating social media. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:30 am by Unknown
Short pieces:The art of impact: Creating engaging video content for awareness campaigns (ENS Blog, Jan. 2024) [text]The Campaign to End Statelessness: April-June 2023 Update (UNHCR, Dec. 2023) [text]New Year’s resolutions: five ways the international community can and must do more to address statelessness (ENS Blog, Jan. 2024) [text]Slovenia announces accession to the 1961 Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness (UNHCR, Dec. 2023) [text]Statelessness in Sweden: 10 facts (UNHCR, Dec. 2023)… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:57 am
Wilton Public Schools (Employment discrimination; motion to strike; claim that trial court erred in granting defendant's motion to strike complaint alleging constructive discharge due to age discrimination; whether plaintiff's complaint to Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities was untimely pursuant to applicable statute ((Rev. to 2019) § 46a-82 (f)). [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:30 am by jeffreynewmanadmin
 Air assets will include F-35s, FA-18s, Harriers, F-15s, helicopters and myriad unmanned aerial vehicles. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 2:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
[ix] In reaching this conclusion, the court acknowledged other California authorities found Section 533 applicable only to indemnity coverage, and inapplicable to an insurer’s duty to defend. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 1:40 pm by Ilya Somin
For these reasons, I have already declared an invasion under Article I, § 10, Clause 3 to invoke Texas's constitutional authority to defend and protect itself. [read post]
The court held: [I]f an offense under [S]ection 17A(3) permits a defendant to re-open in the prosecution the question of the validity of a prohibition even though it has been upheld by the Appeal Board, this would certainly weaken the authority of a prohibition and might encourage people to hold and attend the public meeting despite the prohibition[.] [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:26 am by Mavrick Law Firm
PSLRA plaintiffs also knew the act of suing was usually enough to force the defendants into settlement because PSLRA lawsuits are extremely expensive and onerous to defend. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 11:27 am by Holly
  Rules at Play   Under Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Manual of Procedure § 801.01, “[i]f a party fails to reference a pleaded claim or affirmative defense in its brief, the Board will deem the claim or affirmative defense to have been waived. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Daniel Spiegel
If so, it may want to wait to have a probable cause hearing until the defendant is served with all counts (see G.S. 15A-606(f) for when and how parties can move to continue probable cause hearings). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
In support of that claim, the affected individual argued that they had suffered non-material damage as a result of a personal data breach caused by the Agency’s failure to fulfill its obligations under, inter alia, Articles 5(1)(f), 24 and 32 of the GDPR. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:28 am by Eugene Volokh
In addition to allegations regarding Defendants' purported breach of contract, Plaintiff, in his Complaint and other filings, raises concerns for his safety if his identity were to become public. [read post]