Search for: "Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs, interested parties"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,438
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2016, 10:08 pm
The purpose is to dispel the undue influence of monied interests and the entrenchment of officials in their offices.6 Structure. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Apr. 15, 2016)This case revisits an issue with which courts have struggled: when consumer plaintiffs plead that a product advertised as clinically proven isn’t, is that a mere “lack of substantiation” claim unavailable to private parties? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am
The petitioners now simply insist that the government structure the relationship between third parties -- the insurance company and the women purchasing contraception -- in one way rather than another. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:41 am
Following the oral argument in Zubik, the Court directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether the employees of petitioners with "insured plans" could receive contraceptive coverage "through petitioners’ insurance companies," without requiring the objecting employers to provide either of the forms of "opt out" notice (to the government or to the insurance company) that the current accommodation regulation prescribes. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:29 am
Enforcing rights of first refusal Section four of the draft addresses the right of first refusal–the priority right that existing shareholders have to purchase the shareholding of a party intending to transfer all or part of his shareholding to a third party. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
This is not the first time interested parties have used hacking to gain access to private data – the Rupert Murdoch phone hacking scandal of several years ago was similarly scandalous. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 11:37 am
It directed the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether there might be a viable compromise: Religious groups would simply “contract to provide health insurance for their employees” while excluding contraception. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
Criminal law -- Meritless pro se filings -- Clerk of Court directed to reject any future pleadings or other requests for relief submitted by defendant unless such filings are signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar -- Clerk of Court directed to forward certified copy of opinion to Department of Corrections institution or facility where defendant is incarcerated OTIS D. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 6:56 am
In a direct collision between these two important social interests, a federal appellate court gave online classified ads published Backpage.com an important Section 230 win that will benefit free speech online. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
to continue to be a member of MRI LLC until he could sell [his] 20% interest to the defendants or a third-party for what he considered a fair price. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
to continue to be a member of MRI LLC until he could sell [his] 20% interest to the defendants or a third-party for what he considered a fair price. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
to continue to be a member of MRI LLC until he could sell [his] 20% interest to the defendants or a third-party for what he considered a fair price. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
Nonetheless, Vice Chancellor Glasscock declined to dismiss the complaint because neither party contended that the demand futility requirement applied. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm
Please contact me directly if you are interested in submitting a guest post. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
The new operating agreement authorized the LLC’s majority member to offer to purchase the other members’ interests prior to year-end 2013 for $1.335 per unit, and gave each member the right to accept the offer within 15 days of the offer notice. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am
The new operating agreement authorized the LLC’s majority member to offer to purchase the other members’ interests prior to year-end 2013 for $1.335 per unit, and gave each member the right to accept the offer within 15 days of the offer notice. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:59 am
It didn’t get everything it wanted, but what it did get might pose some interesting technical challenges. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Plaintiffs desired a court-ordered parenting time and custody determination. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 3:08 am
In Alloway, the plaintiff purchased a defective boat, which was built by the (manufacturer) defendant. [read post]
