Search for: "Discovery Benefits, Inc."
Results 661 - 680
of 1,960
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2016, 7:00 am
After the announcement, share prices of other media companies, including Discovery Communications Inc. and AMC Networks Inc., rose immediately. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm
--------Following the close of discovery, defendants moved for summary judgment. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:04 pm
In an effort to avoid the expense of additional discovery and to give the parties an opportunity to settle their dispute over the TMB’s new rules restricting telemedicine services in Texas, the Texas Medical Board (“TMB”) and Teladoc, Inc. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 11:50 am
They have been freed of the need to weigh the potential risks and benefits of their conduct. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm
Enquirer, Inc. (1983) 144 Cal.App.3d 991, 1009; see also Frommoethelydo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
Because Tiffany renewed its summary judgment motion after discovery closed. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 8:03 am
Flare Fittings, Inc. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 7:26 am
The settlement comes after an earlier finding that the class had adequately alleged the company’s liability and permitted discovery to move forward. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
There are at least two major problems with this demand: First, in antitrust conspiracy cases, a plaintiff facing a motion to dismiss rarely has had the benefit of discovery and conspiracy-type evidence—of the sort that might rule out independent conduct—is with the defendants. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
There are at least two major problems with this demand: First, in antitrust conspiracy cases, a plaintiff facing a motion to dismiss rarely has had the benefit of discovery and conspiracy-type evidence—of the sort that might rule out independent conduct—is with the defendants. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
There are at least two major problems with this demand: First, in antitrust conspiracy cases, a plaintiff facing a motion to dismiss rarely has had the benefit of discovery and conspiracy-type evidence—of the sort that might rule out independent conduct—is with the defendants. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 2:59 pm
Ironically, a cost/benefit analysis is most likely what sent them to court in the first place. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 10:42 am
Centers, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 7:13 am
Crossmark, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:34 am
Yesterday, I blogged the first part of an antitrust professors’ amicus brief I joined in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
The question in Visa Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:09 pm
§ 157; Eastex, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am
See Cascade Auto Glass, Inc. v. [read post]
