Search for: "Do v. Mills" Results 661 - 680 of 1,634
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Decisions to expand a manufacturer's post-sale duty beyond making reasonable efforts to warn product users about newly discovered dangers should be left to administrative agencies, which are better able to weight the costs and benefits of such action.Id. at *4 (citation and quotation marks omitted).The more or less mandatory (both for courts and us) "we aren't the first court to do this" string citation is found in footnote 4 of the Reese opinion. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
Because McCullough did not appeal his sentence, we do not reach the merits of the State's cross-appeal.NFP civil opinions today (8): Heather (Parmeter) Scott v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Turkmen and Hasty v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 10:03 am by Jeff Gamso
  In fact, the Supreme Court held, in Mills v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:33 pm
 The decision in question is Case C‑534/10 P Brookfield New Zealand Ltd, Elaris SNC v Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO), Schniga GmbH. [read post]
5 May 2015, 2:34 pm
            The Texas Supreme Court answered yes in its recent decision Randol Mill Pharmacy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:13 am by Charlotte Butash
But I do want to point out that there are two limitations on the Executive power. [read post]