Search for: "Doe v. Shapiro"
Results 661 - 680
of 689
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm
”[21] The Panel explains that this formulation is desirable because it will provide the courts and litigants with notice of appropriate uses of the legislation, and by doing so, it will deter litigation that does not fall within the appropriate uses.[22] As well, a purpose clause will help litigants differentiate between SLAPPs and non-SLAPPs, the latter of which is subject to the limited remedies for traditional civil actions.[23] An effective purpose clause plays the crucial roles… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
So what does this mean? [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
He's a veteran of such battles as Hexion v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
Way back in May, I cracked wise about the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) fictional “Bureau of Let’s Sue Meta,” noting that the commission’s proposal (really, an “order to show cause”) to modify its 2020 settlement of a consumer-protection matter with what had then been Facebook—in other words, a settlement modifying a 2012 settlement—was the FTC’s third enforcement action with Meta in the first half of 2023. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Does the Constitution Require Agencies to Use Biased Judges? [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 1:52 pm
Ilya Somin concurs with Kerr that Congress does have the power if it is so inclined. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:12 pm
Where the flour is sent on the carpets, so that the dough does not stick, there were mealworms. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:49 pm
Consumer Electronics Association CEO Gary Shapiro called the decision a “big victory for innovation. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
(United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am
Michael Shapiro, PTO: if copyright-plus claims are out, would that mean reputational harms aren’t covered? [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 9:14 am
Reflecting this same outlook, the Supreme Court held in 1838 in Kendall v. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 2:29 pm
Even in industries where concentration may have risen, “the evidence does not support claims that concentration is persistent or harmful. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am
Quoted on The Ben Shapiro Show about impeachment (Jan. 23, 2020). [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
King Billable Hour v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:30 am
The DIC retained an outside law firm, Dickstein Shapiro (Dickstein), to assist in the investigation. [read post]
