Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 661 - 680
of 15,318
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2023, 10:00 pm
IRS clarifies, too, that the preventive care safe harbor does not include screening (i.e., testing) for COVID-19, effective as of the date of notice publication (June 23, 2023). [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
What Does It Mean For Your Business? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
What Does It Mean For Your Business? [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
What Does It Mean For Your Business? [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:24 am
This update serves as a follow up to the memorandum dated 23 March 2020. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:30 am
Here’s Chapter 1. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:12 pm
But the fact that the defendant's garbage carts were (we may assume) within the curtilage of his home does not conclude the constitutional analysis. [read post]
15 May 2019, 3:14 am
However, if the evidence shows there to be no demand, the rating hypothesis does not require a departure from that real-world conclusion, merely because the subject property is in theory capable of beneficial occupation. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
Beginning December 23, 2010, the new I-129 form goes into effect. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 10:22 am
The appeal is reported at (2007) 49 R.P.R. (4th) 1. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 4:28 am
Another part of the election law requires the states to send in their electoral votes to Congress by December 23, 2020. [read post]
17 Aug 2008, 4:27 pm
How does government show the proverbial well-trained dog under Caballes? [read post]
15 May 2019, 8:09 pm
The existing Trade Mark Law in China does not readily imply bad faith on trade mark applicants with no genuine intention to use. [read post]
15 May 2019, 8:09 pm
The existing Trade Mark Law in China does not readily imply bad faith on trade mark applicants with no genuine intention to use. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:44 pm
If G 1/18 is applicable, but the case is not stayed as the outcome on the merits of the appeal does not change, can a decision on the reimbursement/refund be made without staying in view of the relevance of G 1/18 on that decision (esp. as refund is not at the discretion of the EPO/Board)? [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:07 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Marvin M. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 8:04 am
The certified questions are: (1) Under Connecticut law, does absolute quasi-judicial immunity extend to conservators appointed by the Connecticut Probate Court? [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 10:53 am
The Court noted their decision in Bentley where it stated that § 34-1-120 does not apply to executory contracts because they do not fall within the applicable definition of a "conveyance" in § 34-1-120. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:35 am
And, how well does the Supreme Court do in setting out Fourth Amendment history? [read post]
