Search for: "Does 1 - 35" Results 661 - 680 of 9,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2019, 8:10 am by Joel Barnett
And according to Fox News, the data demonstrate a 35 percent uptick in sexual assaults reported, compared to last quarter’s reporting, which spanned April 1 through June 30. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
”  Claim 1 includes two elements, both written in means-plus-function (MPF) language. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 4:03 am by Ben
 The form and substance of consentThis said, the Court conceded [para 35] that neither Article 2(a) nor Article 3(1) specify the way in which the prior consent of the author must be expressed: those provisions do not require such consent to be necessarily expressed explicitly. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 8:46 am
and (3) does law enforcement have a reasonable suspicion that the individual violated a criminal law? [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:46 pm
So, what does this mean for patents issued more than two months ago? [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:02 am by Russell Knight
When the child support payor’s employer does not forward the deducted child support, the child support recipient has many avenues to enforce child support payments and punish the uncooperative employer. [read post]
24 May 2017, 3:48 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [1] In tables 7 and 8, “Gov’t below”: (a) includes §5K1.1 Substantial Assistance Departures, §5K3.1 Early Disposition Program Departures and other government-sponsored below-range sentences; (b) does not include Rule 35 reductions for cooperation with the government that take place after sentencing. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 11:52 am by Holly Brezee
” [1] One court even went so far as to state that a patent pending mark gives no notice whatsoever. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 10:57 am by Administrator
Bradshaw, 2017 SCC 35 [1] Hearsay is an out-of-court statement tendered for the truth of its contents. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 2:32 pm
§38-38-103(1)(c) will read:If a recorded instrument does not specify the address of the party purporting to have an interest in the property under such recorded instrument, the party shall not be entitled to notice and any interest in the property under such instrument shall be extinguished upon the execution and delivery of a deed pursuant to section 38-38-501. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The Evolution of FTC Antitrust Enforcement – Highlights of Its Origins and Major Trends 1910-1914 – Creation and Launch The election of 1912, which led to the creation of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), occurred at the apex of the Progressive Era. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 1:58 pm
  Nonetheless, the Office rejects claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 10:20 am by Eric Guttag
Instead, the per curiam majority ruled that the Akamai Technologies and McKesson Technologies cases should be resolved by applying the doctrine of inducing (indirect) infringement under 35 U.S.C § 271(b). [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 12:06 pm by Jacob Pelley
We thought it was settled: $5 million exemptions, 35% tax rates. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:45 am
" Id. at 1333.Bottom line -->In summary, we affirm the district court's decision that claims 1-35 are invalid as indefinite. [read post]
2 May 2017, 3:51 am by Dennis Crouch
From the MPEP: The phrase “on sale” in AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) is treated as having the same meaning as “on sale” in pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(b), except that the sale must make the invention available to the public. [read post]