Search for: "Does 1-11, inclusive"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,620
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2012, 1:24 pm
There does not seem to be much reason why the subcontractor should be bound by that guarantee. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am
The meaning of “treatment” Although s 1 of the Act does not use the word “treatment”, it is clear that the treatment to which s 4 refers is the termination of pregnancy under s 1. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
There were also several resolved complaints, including: Mr Charles Tubbs v Daily Mail, No clause specified, 29/04/2013; Dr John Little v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 26/04/2013; Mrs Deborah Farrell v That’s Life, Clause 1, 25/04/2012; Jessica Westwood v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Neil Turner v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; Ms Judy Gibbons v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 25/04/2013; A woman v Daily Mail, Clause 1,… [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 8:53 am
Does an 84-year-old woman need to be tear-gassed in Seattle? [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§§ 4102.206(a), .207(a), (b).[11] In Reyelts, Magistrate Judge Cureton also determined that LSRC had "engaged in an unconscionable action or course of action as prohibited by section 17.50(a)(3) of the DTPA. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
§§ 4102.206(a), .207(a), (b).[11] In Reyelts, Magistrate Judge Cureton also determined that LSRC had "engaged in an unconscionable action or course of action as prohibited by section 17.50(a)(3) of the DTPA. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
But the exteriorized signification of human rights is contested in its interiorization: what, for instance does it mean for such rights to be self-evident, and on whom on they vested? [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Thursday, December 12, 2019, at 1:30 p.m.: The Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) will host an event on U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 7:00 am
Bearing this in mind, does the draft AUMF really matter? [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 1:45 pm
Numbers of guardians in the building varied between 6 and 11. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 12:14 pm
Our workplace is diverse, inclusive, collegial, and family-friendly. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 5:03 pm
However, merely resting on the inclusion of "incidentally" would pose new problems. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:58 pm
The Domestic Relations Law does not expressly bar same-sex marriage. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 11:55 am
The University is committed to fostering a safe, inclusive and equitable culture that aspires to promote positive change. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 9:39 am
§ 639.3(i)(1), (3)). [read post]
14 May 2020, 2:55 am
Table 1. 2020 U.S. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
In its letter, the applicant explicitly stated that “To the best of my knowledge, the electronic form of the sequence listing corresponds to the printed form, and it does not include matter which goes beyond the content of the application as filed”. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
-U.); 1982, ch. 11 (R. [read post]
