Search for: "Does 1-35" Results 661 - 680 of 9,562
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2023, 9:14 am by Eugene Volokh
§ 31-7-35 (banning gender-affirming treatments for minors) and Idaho Code § 18-1506C (similar), with Cal. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:08 pm by S & F Media LLC.
The amount of durational alimony will be the amount that is required to meet the payee’s reasonable needs, or an amount that does not exceed 35% of the difference between the husband and wife’s net incomes, whichever amount is less. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:42 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
Current law does not require such classification, as most fentanyl-related deaths as classified as an overdose. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
According to the Death Penalty Information Center’s data, all of them have been carried out in just four states, Texas (5), Florida (4), Missouri (3), and Oklahoma (1). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:49 pm by Josh Blackman
Rev. 1, 35–36 (2014) (collecting statements from Justice Scalia); cf. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 6:44 pm
" (Ibid.).(6) Supplementary Provisions.; Article 45.The provision specifies that the law comes into force 1 July 2023. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
In March 2023 the Society withdrew as a party opponent to this petition on this basis [35]. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:11 am by Jan von Hein
In so far, Art. 13 ss 3 no 1 affects unconstitutionally Art. 6 ss 1 Basic Law. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
DCAA’s Audit Rights DCAA’s audit rights are based on statute and contract.[35] DCAA’s statutory audit rights correspond roughly to the “examination of costs” and “certified cost or pricing data” paragraphs of FAR 52.215-2, Audit and Records – Negotiation. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:01 am by Marcel Pemsel
As a consequence, it was argued, the colour-inverted use altered the distinctive character (Art. 18(1)(a) EUTMR). [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[43] But section 14(a) does not specifically preempt state corporate law or even specifically mention shareholder proposals. [read post]