Search for: "Does 1-4 v. United States Attorney Office" Results 661 - 680 of 1,996
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2024, 7:53 am by Marie Nganele
An officer may simultaneously hold more than one office in a corporation, as stated in Section 617.0840(4) of the Florida Not For Profit Corporation Act, which applies to the majority of condominium associations. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
The complaint charges Tsarnaev with two federal crimes: use of a weapon of mass destruction under Title 18, United States Code, Section 2332a and malicious destruction of property resulting in death in violation of Title 18, United States Code, section 844(i). 4. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
§ 2679, requires the United States to be substituted as defendant in place of a government employee facing a common-law tort suit, if the Attorney General certifies that the employee was acting within the scope of his employment. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am by John Ehrett
., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Because Justice Powell's sole vote in the 4-1-4 split cannot set a precedent. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 4:25 am by Steven M. Gursten
” He cited statistics for all drivers – not just truckers – showing that 20 percent of all crashes are related to drowsy driving, with two million drivers a week in the United States nodding off and falling asleep at the wheel. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:52 am by Joel R. Brandes
The office of court administration shall determine and publish the income cap. [read post]
Less than twenty-four hours later, some franchisors (mostly different ones than those who received the information demands) entered into agreements with the Washington State Attorney General’s Office to remove such clauses from their franchise agreements. [read post]