Search for: "Does 1-51"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2019, 2:00 am
The EEOC’s decision not to continue requiring the pay and hours-worked data does not affect the September 30 deadline. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 10:50 am
Op. at ¶51. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 does not mention any duration for the preservation of the coating, i.e. the period between the time of activation of the coating and the time at which a catheter is used. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 7:11 pm
Besides, it cannot be ruled out, that CJEU will one day create a doctrine, where applicability of Article 51(1) of the EU Charter will be automatically (at least temporarily) retained in the cases, when the whole secondary act of the Union law will be (unusually) repealed ab initio (see prof. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm
Whether it does so will say more about America today than at the Founding.Follow @dorfonlaw Michael C. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 7:43 am
Based on the government's outlandish claim that the LA Times hack caused almost a million dollars in damages — more on that in a moment — Keys will likely face a recommended sentencing range of (by my calculation) 51-63 months as a starting point for sentencing arguments,1 and while the court may go considerably lower, it's very unlikely the court will go much higher. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 10:44 am
For example, if the jury awards $1 million dollars, but find the plaintiff 20% at fault, the plaintiff would be compensated $800,000. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:40 am
Bill C-51. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
51; Franco, supra, at para. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:03 pm
Of cases with available information, 101 out of 137 presented with jaundice, 22 of 51 with fever, 20 of 51 had unexplained weight loss and 19 of 52 had abdominal pain. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 5:35 am
The post Conservative MP Ablonzcy on Bill C-51: Who Needs the Rule of Law? [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 6:51 pm
§ 1B1.1 cmt. n.1(E)(2003))-does not mean a departure from a specific sentence determined within the guideline range. [read post]
6 May 2024, 11:13 am
We now adhere to what is called “modified comparative fault with a 51% bar. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 8:44 am
They are: 1) Does the publication contribute to a debate of general interest? [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:38 am
" (See, e.g., Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Separate Statement ["PRSS"], Nos. 26, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34, 38, 48, 51, 62, 63, 64 and 65.) [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 12:45 pm
Ct. 980, 51 L. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 1:29 pm
An expert witness’s reliance upon a study does not make the study admissible. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
So how does preemption work? [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 10:22 am
One is to compare the way USNWR does the ranking (separating indebtedness from percent incurring debt) with one metric that combines them. [read post]
