Search for: "Does 1-71" Results 661 - 680 of 2,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2020, 11:29 am by Léon Dijkman
Much of the rest of the decision is devoted to the correct way to perform the likelihood of confusion test of Art. 8(1)(b) Regulation 207/2009 [now superseded by art. 9(2)(b) Regulation 2017/1001, the EU Trade Mark Regulation]. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 12:50 pm by Richard Hunt
Coleman, 455 U.S. 363, 373, 102 S.Ct. 1114, 71 L.Ed.2d 214 (1982) that Section 3604(f)(1) does not apply to cases brought by testers because there is no sale or rental of a dwelling. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:02 pm by sydniemery
Banta, Electronic Wills and Digital Assets: Reassessing Formality in the Digital Age, 71 Baylor L. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 4:40 am by MBettman
Jacques, 71 Ohio St. 395 (1905) (If a person wishes to dispose of his or her property in a manner contrary to the statutes of descent and distribution, the person must do so in a will that fulfills the requirements of R.C. 2107.03.) [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:02 pm
 At [71], it again took the view that the applicant's argument had been insufficiently 'concrete' to displace the Board of Appeal's assessment in relation to certain goods in Class 20. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am by Chris Wesner
Culkin, 248 N.Y. 465, 470–71, 162 N.E. 487 (1928). [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 12:57 pm by Mark Wortman
” State law does not necessarily require a court to order either parent to pay child support, but it occurs in almost every case involving minor children. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 3:45 am by Tim James-Matthews
(ii) Does the applicable standard of proof of death by suicide depend upon whether the determination is expressed by way of short-form or narrative conclusion? [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 7:41 am by Florian Mueller
Hufnagel just can't see how--under EU antitrust law as interpreted by the CJEU--the Munich court could hand Nokia an injunction against Daimler despite having found (on a preliminary basis) that Daimler's counterproposal (for taking a license to Nokia's SEPs) appears FRAND-compliant, unless the court thoroughly evaluated both parties' proposed terms and reached a determination that Daimler's offer was not FRAND.The primary authority on this question is paragraph 71… [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 7:16 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Ontario (Minister of Labour), 2003 SCC 29, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 539, at para. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Specific taxation does not require valuation and as such does not require expensive tax administration, as is the case for ad valorem where vertically integrated companies must compute a value to determine tax liability. [read post]