Search for: "Driver v. State" Results 661 - 680 of 11,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Considering the issue in light of more recent decisions from both the United States Supreme Court and our sister states, we now conclude that the desire to obtain a driver’s identification following a traffic stop does not constitute an independent, categorical exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:53 am
Léveillé, [1933] S.C.R. 456 (S.C.C.), the Court considered the role circumstantial evidence plays in meeting the burden of proof and stated at para. 35: The general principle in accordance with which in cases like the present the sufficiency of the evidence is to be determined was stated by Lord Chancellor Loreburn in Richard Evans & Co., Limited v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9)  the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
In this regard, the Government introduced copies of applications to the DMV for Nevada driver's licenses and state identity cards in V's name. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 1:29 pm
Because, as our Hollywood car accident lawyers know, South Carolina had been one of a handful of states - Florida included - that allows insurers to contain a clause in their policy that lowers limits to state minimums for permissive drivers. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:49 am by Paul Willetts
On January 2, the Court of Appeal for Ontario released its first decision of 2019: Heller v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 7:37 pm
But now an adult Green seeks compensation from her Illinois school district based on its liability in the abuse (Green v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm has seemingly responded to this new law by refusing to waive subrogation in just about every case where the at-fault driver tenders the policy limits. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 7:11 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
  In other words, there is a clear divide between the parties on opposites sides of the “v” as lawyers often say referring to the way a case is captioned with Defendant v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:57 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Warger v. [read post]