Search for: "Eli Lilly " Results 661 - 680 of 2,131
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2015, 5:33 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the agreement would also expand the right of pharmaceutical companies to sue governments over national laws, creating the prospect of more lawsuits similar to the $500 million lawsuit launched by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly against the Government of Canada. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 5:31 am by Michael Geist
In fact, the agreement would also expand the right of pharmaceutical companies to sue governments over national laws, creating the prospect of more lawsuits similar to the $500 million lawsuit launched by pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly against the Government of Canada. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:55 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with non-Indiana co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly Export S.A. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 4:18 am by Mark Summerfield
  Furthermore, the previous week the England and Wales Court of Appeal issued a decision in Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555, which also involved Swiss-type claims.It is interesting to compare the two decisions, particularly because, in my view, the UK court managed to completely undermine the European prohibition on patents for methods of medical treatment and must surely, therefore, be wrong! [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
 In the brand-new Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015), Lord Justice Floyd (Lords Justices Kitchin and Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
 In the admirably brief Court of Appeal decision just out - Actavis UK Ltd & Others v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555 (25 June 2015) , Lord Justice Floyd (Lord Justice Kitchin and Lord Justice Longmore concurring) disagreed with Arnold J on two main issues - one on which nothing turns in the end (although it has important wider significance), and one which has the result that this case seems set to run and run.The claimBut let's recap a bit. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 2:54 am
In re Eli Lilly and Company, Serial No. 85183667 (June 18, 2015) [not precedential].The examining attorney maintained that the specimen of use (shown below) "shows the proposed mark as part of [a] logically connected and continuous sentence .... [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:06 pm
But, according to AboutLawsuits.com, the BMJ editors also noted that Young has served as an advisor for major drug companies that manufacture drugs to treat some mental disorders, including AstraZeneca, which makes Seroquel, Lundbeck, which makes Abilify and Lexapro, and Eli Lilly, which makes Prozac. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:02 pm by Lydia Zuraw
(Elanco Animal Health is a division of the Eli Lilly drug company.) [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:46 am by Michael Geist
For example, pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly is suing Canada for hundreds of millions in damages due Canadian patent law. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 5:45 am by Michael Geist
For example, pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly is suing Canada for hundreds of millions in damages due Canadian patent law. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
JPMorgan Chase and Company, (SD IN, May 21, 2015), an Indiana federal district court dismissed with leave to replead constructive fraud claims against Chase Bank and its parent JPMorgan brought by Christ Church Cathedral that lost some $13.5 million from trusts that had been set up to benefit it under the will of Eli Lilly. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:53 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly and Company of Indianapolis, Indiana; Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. of Tokyo, Japan; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. of Parsippany, New Jersey; and Ube Industries, Ltd of Yamaguchi, Japan filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that HEC Pharm USA, Inc. of Princeton, New Jersey and HEC Pharm Co. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In Human Genome Sciences Inc. v Eli Lilly and Company [2011] UKSC 51 the Supreme Court reversed the findings of the High Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:29 am by Derek T. Braslow
Last year, a federal jury in Louisiana ordered Takeda and Eli Lilly & Co., which partnered with Takeda to sell Actos in the US, to pay a combined $9 billion judgment to a plaintiff who claimed that Actos caused his bladder cancer. [read post]