Search for: "English v. English"
Results 661 - 680
of 11,167
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2014, 1:17 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 12:58 am
(1) Cavell USA (2) Kenneth Edward Randall v (1) Seaton Insurance (2) Stonewall Insurance [2009] EWCA Civ 1363, concerned the construction of a Termination and Release Agreement, which provided for English law and jurisdiction and, under clause 13, for a full release by Randall from "all actions, causes of action, suits, claims and demands whatsoever, whether at law or equity…save…(iii) in the case of fraud" on Randall's part. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:42 am
An English court has refused an injunction against the publication of the story of an alleged affair between a well-known football player and a teammate’s girlfriend: Terry v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 6:41 am
As September ended, the "battle season" was also ending, but Henry V surprised the French by not wintering at the English stronghold at Calais, and crossing the Somme and heading north. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:37 am
Unwired Planet v Huawei and Conversant v Huawei and ZTE [2020] UKSC 37 Overview The principle issue before the Supreme Court was whether or not an English court was able and entitled to set the terms of a global portfolio FRAND (“fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory”) licence for patents declared by a standards body to be essential for the technology in question (“Standard Essential Patents” or “SEP”s) where all the parties had not… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The judge focused on Shaffer v. [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
Lord Hoffmann, however, in Berezovsky v Michaels (2001) made clear that the formulation of the claim was but one of the factors to be taken into account by the English court in deciding upon the appropriate forum. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 6:21 am
In Guzman v. [read post]
30 Aug 2006, 2:17 pm
LawPundit has reorganized the list for English-language purposes and has added the official English translations (as available at the respective online pages) - as well as the appropriate links to those pages - and has expanded the language key to include: lv = Latvian language, en = English language, fr = French language, de = German language, ru = Russian language, thus also adding some French and German language pages which Alliks does not mention, since these are few. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 9:39 am
http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news13_e/400_401r_e.htm Obviously, there is a lot to digest there. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Armour v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 1:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 12:05 pm
In KC & Anor v City of Westminster Social & Community Services Dept. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 5:45 am
The case is styled, Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 8:01 pm
Federal Election Commission in Plain English. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:38 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MacKreth (Deceased), R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1849 (08 September 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Historic Buildings Monuments Commission for England (English Heritage) & Ors v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 2287 (Admin) (17 September 2009) High Court (Technology and Construction Court) Tai Ping Carpets UK [...] [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:52 am
Elliott Visconsi, Yale English Department and Law School, has posted The Invention of Criminal Blasphemy: Rex v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:07 am
Hodges in Plain English. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
