Search for: "Estate of Miller"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2018, 3:04 pm
Miller Partner at Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig’s Vienna Office. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 3:04 pm
Miller Partner at Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig’s Vienna Office. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 1:15 pm
In a lengthy published opinion filed August 23, 2018, the Second District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment, and upheld the City of Los Angeles’ addendum to a prior project-level EIR for a Target Superstore as legally sufficient CEQA compliance for a revised plan-level project which amended a specific plan so as to authorize that same development. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 4:37 pm
In a lengthy published opinion filed on August 22, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed the trial court’s judgment rejecting various CEQA challenges to the City of San Francisco’s (“City”) Program EIR analyzing the environmental impacts of its 2009 General Plan Housing Element, which it adopted on June 29, 2011. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 1:12 pm
Bethesda-based commercial real estate services and finance company Walker & Dunlop Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
In an opinion filed July 16, and belatedly ordered published on August 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 5) affirmed the trial court’s judgment setting aside the City of Fremont’s approvals of a mixed residential/retail project (“Project”) and related Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”), and ordering preparation of an EIR based on the Project’s potentially significant aesthetic and traffic impacts on the Niles historical district. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 2:59 pm
Below the fold are the results of the 2018-2019 Law Professor Twitter Census. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
In an opinion filed June 28, and later ordered modified and published on July 27, 2018, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 6) affirmed the trial court’s $21,160.46 cost award in favor of a prevailing party public agency for costs associated with preparing the administrative record in a CEQA case, despite petitioner’s election to prepare the record, where the petitioner had unreasonably delayed and the agency acted reasonably. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:19 am
Joining Kean Miller as equity partners are James H. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:46 am
Robert died in May 2014 and no estate was opened. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 7:15 am
Kathleen Krafft Miller is an attorney at Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:16 am
Robert died in May 2014 and no estate was opened. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 1:52 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 2:00 pm
Miller, and Robert H. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:40 pm
In a published opinion filed June 13, 2018, the Second District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed a judgment denying a writ of mandate and declaratory relief in an action challenging the California State Lands Commission’s (“Commission”) determination that CEQA Guidelines § 15301’s categorical exemption for “existing facilities” applied to its renewal of PG&E’s leases of state-owned lands needed to operate the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant until… [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:29 pm
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:59 pm
James “Jamie” Roth has joined the litigation practice group with Miller, Miller & Canby. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 4th, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 12:10 pm
A development project’s potential noise impacts can implicate complex and technical issues under CEQA, particularly where those impacts are asserted, in litigation by project opponents challenging a negative declaration, as the sole basis an EIR should have been required. [read post]
