Search for: "Ex parte J. A. L."
Results 661 - 680
of 745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Indústria e Comércio v OHIM, Consorci de l'Espai Rural de Gallecs (Class 46) CFI: John Deere prevails before CFI with colour combination mark: BCS v OHIM, Deere (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI finds trademarks containing common element in identical font confusingly similar in Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co v Goya Importaciones y Distribuciones (Class 46) CFI: RNAiFect and RNActive: who would get confused? [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 6:12 am
Therefore, in many situations the companies might not have this information ex ante. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
David L. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
See Russell L. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 3:53 am
Powers , 9 Yale J. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) BPAI uses dictionary published six years after filing date in rejecting claims: Ex Parte Davis (Gray on Claims) BPAI rejects claims, finding PHOSITA would have to make speculative assumptions concerning the meaning of claim language: Ex parte Brune (Gray on Claims) ITC reverses Remand Initial Determination and finds no violation in investigation relating to coolants brought by INEOS against Sinochem (ITC 337 Law… [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
"Third, Kenneth Ross and J. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
TTAB finds DIRT DRIFTERS merely descriptive: In re Esposito (not precedential) (TTABlog) TTAB: Registration denied for GITZIT mark based on earlier identical mark for identical goods: J L Pennington v GITZIT, Inc (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Dana-Farber Cancer Institute – DFCI protests Dr Farber’s The Farber Center for Radiation Oncology (The Trademark Blog) Gosling – Discussion of… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(IAM) (Inventive Step) House passes HR 3114 which permits patent side of the PTO to ‘borrow’ money from the trademark side (Inventive Step) US Patent Reform ‘Reasonable royalty payments’ in need of a reform (IP Osgoode) US Patents USPTO initiates patent prosecution highway pilot program with Finland (Patent Docs) Appeals ‘skyrocket’ at the USPTO (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Changing nature of inventing:… [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 4:36 am
PART B Sec. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
Leaving terms open for future agreement: Nutraceuticals v Mucos Pharma (The IP ADR Blog) US Patents USPTO launches patent prosecution highway to Finland (Managing Intellectual Property) Did you know... that all counterclaims asserted in section 337 cases are automatically removed to US District Court (ITC 337 Law Blog) Recent developments under section 337 of the Tariff Act (International Law Office) United Inventors Association patent to market mini-series: episode 1 ‘How… [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
Colting expressed the view that he “wrote 60 Years as a critical exploration of such themes as the relationship between J. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 am
The Reilly case concerned a will that was executed by Bernard J. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 2:21 pm
The Court reverses and renders in part and affirms in part the court of appeals' judgment. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:01 pm
For starters, the USPTO is taking about 24 months to decide ex parte reexaminations. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Sylvester J. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 11:57 am
Nulle part ailleurs ces deux professions ne sont fusionnées. [read post]
