Search for: "FLOWERS v. FLOWERS"
Results 661 - 680
of 1,178
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2015, 4:05 am
In State of Washington v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:15 pm
United States 14-874Issue: Whether in light of Flower v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
In a 2012 decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 12:57 pm
Hearts, candy, flowers, and dinner dates are all symbols and activities of this special day. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:20 am
AP reports that a Washington state trial court judge yesterday denied two motions to dismiss in State of Washington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 2:47 am
.Van Gogh always found it more difficult topaint genetically modified flowersControversiesThe patenting of ‘life’ creates ethical dilemmas. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 3:39 am
He carries around his neck a garland of flowers and a barrel, such as those used by Saint Bernard dogs to rescue people lost in the snow. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 6:14 am
I dug that up in the process of writing that last post, where I was going to go on about whether the performance artist — sitting in her "homey setup with a lamp, an ottoman, a tasteful rug, and an end table decorated with a pot of bright orange flowers" — had a don't-break-the-4th-wall conception of her performance art. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Society is not obliged to adopt the sensitivities of the most delicate flower among us. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xiii] Yates v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:36 am
., Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited, [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch), 22 May 2009. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 5:28 am
The delicate flower will be hurt by almost anything. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 12:02 pm
Hogaboom v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 9:45 pm
For example, in Kraft Foods Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 6:17 pm
Edible Arrangements, LLC et al v. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 4:30 pm
As part of the settlement, proceeds from the song “Flowers in the Rain” continue to be paid to charity. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 2:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 4:10 pm
(For example, a vase is a "vehicle" in which to hold flowers, but I'm pretty sure that's not what the statute covers.)Because, fortunately, we don't have to resort to common language. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Evansand United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
The answer, at least on the outset, is not an obvious one, but was faced by the United Kingdom Court of Appeals over a decade ago.The case in question is 1-800 Flowers Inc v Phonenames Ltd, decided in the very first year of the second millennium, which dealt with the phone number "800-FLOWERS", registered in the US as a trademark in the mid 1980s by the company 800-Flowers Inc. [read post]
