Search for: "FPD" Results 661 - 680 of 761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2008, 4:36 am
Still, it establishes again that proof is required for a violation and defendant has a right to contest it.Congratulations to AFPD Matt Winter and FPD Peter Wolf of the Hawaii FPD office. [read post]
10 May 2008, 9:11 pm by Tom Lincoln
    Place    :    Judge García Gregory’s Courtrooom (#6) Resources:    José Cordero, of FPD-PR, formerly of BOP                    Jorge Rivera Ortíz, PRACDLModerator:    Linda Backiel If you are interested in attending, please confirm via email at pracdl@gmail.com. [read post]
6 May 2008, 7:12 am
O'Scannlain dissented, arguing that the state supreme court's application of Jackson and federal law was reasonable, and that the evidence had to be viewed in the light most favorable to the state, and here there was circumstantial evidence, and some weight should be given to DNA.Congratulations to Paul Turner and Franny Forsman of the Nevada FPD Office (Las Vegas).U.S. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:55 am
In response to Commissioner Steer's request regarding the FPDs' plans for implementing the amendment, we provided a post-hearing submission detailing the approach to identifying clients, obtaining representation, and litigating § 3582(c) motions (here). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:10 am
Yes, the defendants' sentences were still affirmed, but the jurisdiction to examine pleas and waivers was vindicated.AFPD Steve Sady of the Oregon FPD filed an excellent amicus brief on behalf of the Ninth Circuit federal public and community defenders on this important point. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 4:59 am
Hall would force the petitioner to play out the hand on state review.Congratulations to AFPD Tom hester of the Oregon FPD office (Portland).U.S. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:44 am
Here, there was no prior waiver and so the officers had to ascertain the meaning from the get go.Congratulations to AFPD Jason Carr of the Nevada (Las Vegas) FPD office.Manta v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:43 am
Do you want to follow criminal law developments in the Ninth Circuit? [read post]