Search for: "FRENCH v. STATE"
Results 661 - 680
of 3,450
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am
In Baldassi & Others v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 4:05 am
This week, in E.M. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
1 Aug 2020, 10:44 am
State v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
Steve also stated that consumer education (e.g. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:02 am
At 10, the authors state that third parties which are not nominal addressees of the FRAND commitment may still "benefit from the Huawei v ZTE negotiation framework". [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
Oracle v Google Copyright Case Slated For Supreme Court Arguments — Originally scheduled to be heard by the Supreme Court this past March, oral arguments in Oracle v Google were first postponed because of the pandemic and then delayed until next term. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
This seems to be the prevailing view from Michael McConnell, Akhil Amar, Jeffrey Rosen, Mark Movsesian, David French, and others. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
Dorman v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 2:51 am
Such modes of service where the defendant is likely to be domiciled in another state have been condemned as insufficient by the ECJ in cases such as: Case 166/80 Peter Klomps v Karl Michel [1981] ECR 1593; Case C-300/14 Imtech Marine Belgium NV v Radio Hellenic SA ECLI:EU:C:2015:825; Case C-289/17 Collect Inkasso OU v Aint 2018 EU:C:2018. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 10:34 am
AOL and Reno v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
Perhaps most troubling is the requirement to take down content within 24 hours of notification -- a standard much like the one recently deemed to unconstitutionally infringe users’ expression rights under French legal standards. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am
Comments: Regarding substituted service, the Facebook judgment provides that[4] ‘[t]his Court has held, in circumstances analogous to the present, that an order for substituted service may be made under either r 10.24 or r 10.49 : Commissioner of Taxation v Zeitouni (2013) 306 ALR 603 at [60] (Katzmann J); see also: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kokos International Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 2035 at [18] (French J); Commissioner of Taxation v… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:55 am
Welsh landlords cannot serve possession notices if unlicensed This is the case of Jarvis v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 5:13 am
In Glawischnig-Piesczek v Facebook, the Court of Justice of the EU held that a court of a Member State can order platforms not only to take down defamatory content globally, but also to take down identical or “equivalent” material. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 8:33 am
De Boulle Diamond & Jewelry, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:41 am
Since the reform of Art. 1195 of the French Civil Code in 2016, a similar rule is in force also in France. [read post]