Search for: "Federal Insurance Co. v. United States" Results 661 - 680 of 1,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2019, 6:15 am by Aurora Barnes
Land of Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 6:45 am
Rather, if plaintiffs believe the injunction is no longer valid, their recourse is to go back to the court where the injunction issued and challenge it there.In a footnote, the 11th Circuit references a recent 2009, United States of Court of Appeals D.C. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 4:43 am
Many years ago Thomas McCracken, the then director of the Department of Civil Service’s health insurance unit, concluded that the State could realize substantial financial benefits in terms of a reduction in the employer’s contributions to the New York State Health Insurance Program for State and Local Government [NYSHIP] if individuals and the dependents of such individuals that were Medicare eligible retirees had Medicare as… [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
 This procedure is known as a “CVSG” – “Call for the Views of the Solicitor General” – and it is most common in cases in which the United States is not a party but which involve, for example, a federal interest or the interpretation of a federal statute. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm by Law Lady
Representation Agreement [and] Sales Management Agreement” wherein Alasko retained Foodmark to market Alasko’s products in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:15 am by Erin Miller
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. (09-448), Rent-A-Center v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:08 am by Jon L. Gelman
The 911 event raised issues as to insurance company solvency, and Congress enacted .The Terrorism Risk Insurance Act [TRIA] , a United States federal law signed into law by President George W. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
”Id. at 1141-42 (various citations omitted).Courts in other states following this general approach are:  Haygood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Although the United States suffered a long era in which the law made it difficult, if not impossible, to access contraception—a federal law passed in 1873 restricted the sale and circulation of contraception among other “obscene” things—that era more or less ended in 1965 when the Supreme Court ruled in Griswold v. [read post]